Intergroup Discrimination in Cooperation Among Moral and Non-Moral Groups
نویسندگان
چکیده
In-group favouritism is ubiquitous and previous studies have consistently found that individuals cooperate more with in-group members than out-group in diverse contexts. Yet, there has not been much research on the role of nature groups intergroup cooperation. A recent study stronger levels amongst formed basis shared moral values. However, it remained unclear whether increased was caused by a greater tendency to act favourably towards or derogatorily out-group. The present thus investigated cooperation among morality-based non-morality-based examined an member as compared person whose group membership unknown. Regardless how were formed, present, while derogation absent. Furthermore, we morality promoted indirectly via low perceived warmth. Our provides further evidence favouring behaviour does include derogating out-groups points importance investigation into
منابع مشابه
Title : Expectation and Evaluation in Moral and Non - Moral Contexts
Copyright Information: All rights reserved unless otherwise indicated. Contact the author or original publisher for any necessary permissions. eScholarship is not the copyright owner for deposited works. Learn more at People's evaluations of events often depend on their expectations about those events. There is often disappointment when events fail to meet expectations—sometimes even when the e...
متن کاملNoradrenaline effects on social behaviour, intergroup relations, and moral decisions
Recent research has begun to elucidate the neural basis of higher order social concepts, such as the mechanisms involved in intergroup relations, and moral judgments. Most theories have concentrated on higher order emotions, such as guilt, shame, or empathy, as core mechanisms. Accordingly, psychopharmacological and neurobiological studies have investigated the effects of manipulating serotonin...
متن کاملMoral Repair and the Moral Saints Problem
This article explores the forms of moral repair that the wrongdoer has to perform in an attempt to make amends for her past wrongdoing, with a focus on the issues of interpersonal moral repair; that is, what a wrongdoer can do to merit her victim‘s forgiveness and achieve reconciliation with her community. The article argues against the very general demands of atonement that amount to an obliga...
متن کاملThe Enforcement of Moral Boundaries Promotes Cooperation and Prosocial Behavior in Groups
The threat of free-riding makes the marshalling of cooperation from group members a fundamental challenge of social life. Where classical social science theory saw the enforcement of moral boundaries as a critical way by which group members regulate one another's self-interest and build cooperation, moral judgments have most often been studied as processes internal to individuals. Here we inves...
متن کاملThe Non-moral Basis of Cognitive Biases of Moral Intuitions
Against moral intuitionism, which holds that moral intuitions can be non-inferentially justified, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong argues that moral intuitions are unreliable and must be confirmed to be justified (i.e. must be justified inferentially) because they are subject to cognitive biases. However, I suggest this is merely a renewed version of the argument from disagreement against intuitionism....
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Letters on Evolutionary Behavioral Science
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1884-927X']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5178/lebs.2021.86